This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Hi Howard the Duck, thank you for reviewing the UNTV Cup seasons articles! May I ask you to check this specific article if you have review points? Thank you in advance!
Hi Howard the Duck, thank you for reviewing this article! May I ask for more details about the issues and steps to perform so I can improve this page? Thank you in advance!
I guess after so many years that Howard the Duck disappeared and nobody wants to make another review of this page, I will remove the tag at the top of the page. bise tanod (talk)
It's been eb a decade and no improvements. Same one source article that is intricately written. Please do not remove tags without improving this a whole lot. Howard the Duck (talk) 03:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies also if this was not replied to in time. The tags are meant to be self-explanatory. I know there is a learning crisis in this country, but let me explain each tag further:
Intricate detail: I can probably understand playoff games, but the regular seasin game results are all listed chronologically. Like even the 2023-24 Premier League doesn't even do that. This is deserved for continental-level events, and this tournament is nowhere near that.
Single source: Hundreds of references are from UNTV.
Primary source: Hundreds of references are from UNTV, which organized the tournament.
I know hundreds of references do make sure this tournament looks like it's more important than it really is, but I suggest checking out the PBA, UAAP and NCAA basketball articles on how they are presented. Even volleyball articles are slightly better. Howard the Duck (talk) 03:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you have just explained it this way for the past few years, and in a not rude way, I would have gotten your point earlier, time is not wasted, and we could have gotten this nonsense finished. I'm wiling to comply, but since I'm not a professional editor, I have no background how to correct everything. All I needed were kind words and guidance. I'm expecting you will not give either. bise tanod (talk) 03:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No one here is a professional (except perhaps WP:PAIDEDITING and WP:COI). If you do not want your work to be edited by other people mercilessly and be feedbacked (is that a word?) upon, Wikipedia is not for you. There are plenty of other Wikis for you, and you can even create a separate UNTV Cup Wiki if you are able to. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:27, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the demotivation and destructive feedback. bise tanod (talk) 03:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted your removal of justified tags. Removal without action is WP:VANDALISM and may be reported the next time it happens. Please work on the article first before removing tags. There are examples previously given, again, I know there's an education crisis in this country, but it wouldn't hurt to read the articles cited as examples.
The article structure and bracket doesn't even make sense. I can't understand the "Quarterfinals" section. "Advanced to the semifinals from second round"? What? It is supposed to be another "group stage" or a playoff format? Why is there a QF section in the brackets, with "TBD", then we see the rest of the tournament progress from that? It seems that the top 4 teams from the quarterfinals make it to the semifinals. Is that right? Again, there are examples of similar formats found in the articles I cited earlier. It pays to read. Howard the Duck (talk) 20:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
