Talk:UMTS frequency bands

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Radio Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Archives: 1

Reserved bands[edit]

Seeing that the reserved bands have been removed on the LTE frequency bands article, should the same be done on this page or should we leave it as is? Joshua Shah (talk) 00:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think we may leave them here, as there are not too many bands specified compared to the LTE standard, but one might use grey text colour for the respective columns. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 22:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Joshua Shah (talk) 22:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Center frequency range and UARFCN equation[edit]

Are the Center frequency range and UARFCN equation columns necessary because these columns add unnecessary clutter to the page and may violate WP:DIRECTORY. Joshua Shah (talk) 02:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree - WP:TOOMUCH may apply as well. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So should we remove those columns or leave it as is? Joshua Shah (talk) 16:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree to have them removed. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 19:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll get to it then. Joshua Shah (talk) 23:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should the UARFCN info be kept or should it be removed as well? Joshua Shah (talk) 23:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd keep the latter, but one may think about optimising column width in order to improve the filling degree of the respective fields. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 13:50, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]