Talk:Typhoon Dujuan (2003)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTyphoon Dujuan (2003) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starTyphoon Dujuan (2003) is part of the 2003 Pacific typhoon season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 12, 2013Good article nomineeListed
October 27, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Todo[edit]

Good article, the only thing it needs is an aftermath section. 68.106.152.102 (talk) 20:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't really find any aftermath. The damage was fairly bad, but not so bad that it had significant lasting consequences. The name wasn't retired, and there wasn't any follow-up information in ReliefWeb. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:39, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Dujuan (2003)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 01:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Typhoon Dujuan (international designation: 0313,[1] JTWC designation: 14W,[2] PAGASA name: Onyok[3]) was the strongest tropical cyclone to strike the Pearl River delta since Typhoon Hope in 1979" link to 1979 PTS when you say "1979". YE Pacific Hurricane 01:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't think the season article link is needed when I already link to the storm. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Dujuan weakened to severe tropical storm status before making landfall on September 2 in southern China," what's a "severe tropical storm"? (I know what it is, but the average American that sits and eats all day may not :P ). YE Pacific Hurricane 01:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • ", naming it Onyok.[3]" link to List of tropical cyclone names here. YE Pacific Hurricane 01:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Radar from the Hong Kong Observatory indicated in inner eye about 20 km (12 mi) in diameter," "in" to "an". YE Pacific Hurricane 01:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "there was about NT$200 (TWD, $115 million USD)" was about $200 in what? damages? french toasts? basketballs? scooters? Also, you sure it was $200 or $200 million. Or does Twain have no inflation? :P YE Pacific Hurricane 01:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "for the first time since Typhoon York 1999.[6][16] " missing an "in". And link to York 99/1999 PTS's articles. YE Pacific Hurricane 01:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In all, very good. YE Pacific Hurricane 01:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Typhoon Dujuan (2003). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]