Talk:Typhoon Babs (1998)

Typhoon Babs (1998) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 10, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Typhoons in the Philippines#Public Storm Warning Signals|Public Storm Warning Signal #4]] The anchor (#Public Storm Warning Signals) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Todo[edit]

I rated this as a start, though it needs a lot of work. The intro makes little sense and needs more info, the infobox needs a picture and is incorrect (Babs peaked at 155), a longer storm history is needed, and the impact should be greatly expanded upon. Hurricanehink 23:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Unisys best track data showed Babs at Category 5 status. Storm05 15:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was operationally. In the official JTWC best track, Babs was a Category 4, albeit a strong one. Still more info is needed in the impact. Hurricanehink 16:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture[edit]

I found two picture links. Which should go in the infobox? This, which shows it near its Philippine landfall, or this, which shows a broader view and a more impressive structure? I personally vote for #2. Hurricanehink 19:22, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, why not both? Hurricanehink (talk) 21:41, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Babs (1998)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cyclonebiskit (talk · contribs) 20:44, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping a note that I'll be reviewing this article later today. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All in all an excellent article as always, Hink. I have one minor issue to bring up. In the "Elsewhere" section, toward the end of the first paragraph, you seem to have been cut-off in the middle of a thought and forgot to finish it: Beaches were wh Precipitation from the typhoon fell over three days.... Once this is addressed I'll be happy to pass the article.

Regards, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now, happily passing. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]