Talk:Type 10 120 mm AA gun

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Japanese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Japan Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 16:33, May 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Stub

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Same as Type 10 Dual purpose gun ?[edit]

Is it possible that this gun may also be the Type 10 12 cm Dual purpose gun ?
I've just translated this article from english to french and this bother me !
Any expert advice ? Kostic31 (talk) 19:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! If you mean this one then yes - it's the same weapon. --Ozzy (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep that's the one ! :) Thanks--Kostic31 (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Klbrain (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

11th year gun[edit]

There's some recent discussion over at Talk:12 cm/45 10th Year Type naval gun#12 cm 11th Year Type M - Naval Gun which, following the merge, is probably better discussed here. Klbrain (talk) 21:41, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Tenth Year Type"[edit]

I don't know if it's just a coincidence, but in the Imperial Navy practice, the "3rd Year Type" or "10th Yer Type" did not refer to the year the gun went into service itself, but the year the type of breech was accepted . A gun that is designated "3rd Year Type" uses a Welin block interrupted screw, and there are at least half a dozen different guns in the IJN called "Xcm/X 3rd Year Type". It mentions this on 20 cm/50 3rd Year Type naval gun. So it's possible that the original Type 10 designation was totally a coincidence, and does in fact refer to the year the gun was adopted, but it makes me wonder if this is the same as a Tenth Year Type in the Navy, which could be vertical sliding block, or any other type of breech design. Since an artillery gun is mostly a tube and a breech, and the main distinction between various guns lies in the breech system, the carriage, and the recoil system, and I doubt that many of the land-based gun's accessories were translated into the naval version, it seems entirely possible. Idumea47b (talk) 00:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! In this case it should be 10th Year Type (十年式). Just Type 10 is wrong. The difference is counting years according Japanese calendar (type 式) or counting year according the rule of the Emperor (year type 年式). --Ozzy (talk) 16:32, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]