Talk:Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jumping The Shark[edit]

I would tend to disagree with the fact that many fans cite this as the Jump The Shark moment for PR. Any issues with it being removed? JPG-GR 17:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Turbo a power rangers movie.jpg[edit]

Image:Turbo a power rangers movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Differences[edit]

There is a huge section about the differences between the show and the movie in the article about the MMPR movie. Something similar could be added to this article. For example, I've always been wondering why Zordon looks so different in the movie. 77.47.6.23 (talk) 01:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me for pointing this out...[edit]

Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie aired on Cartoon Network some time ago. I had hoped, in petitions, that the rest of the franchise would air on Cartoon Network, but now that I have been informed that the franchise has been renewed, and the series will soon air on Nickelodeon with new episodes, this makes this film the only Power Rangers program to air on Cartoon Network. I don't know if it's possible, but could someone add this piece of Trivia to the article?
~~LDEJRuff~~ (see what I've contributed) 0:59, 16 May 2010 (EDT)

WP:TRIVIA. JPG-GR (talk) 06:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Something else, too. Put in the following on the main part of the article.

"Thanks to the failure of the film, a planned Time Force was scrapped." 118.209.236.168 (talk) 06:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American–Japanese co-pro?[edit]

Both AFI and British Film Institute call this film an American film. AFI indicates that the film's copyright holder is Saban. Does anyone have any details that supports that this was a proper co-pro with Toei and not, say, something symbolic, or that Toei was sub-contracted? I know nothing of this subject. There is this copyright record that indicates Toei owns part of the copyright. Do we have anything else? We may not need it, I'm just curious. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Long story short - Toei supplied all the suit designs for the Rangers & Zords/Megazord from their series Carranger to Saban, Saban then worked with 20th Century Fox to film and produce the movie (and Saban at the time was a key part of the Fox Kids side of the Fox Family branch, as Power Rangers was airing on Fox Kids until Disney bought Fox Family as a whole in 2002, including the back catalogue of Saban's live-action series such as Power Rangers, Masked Rider and BeetleBorgs being the big 3). Once the movie was done then Saban started work on adapting the Carranger series footage for the Power Rangers: Turbo series proper, using the first 3 episodes to partially re-cap the events of the movie and get the show proper running. Apart from PR-only creations like the Titanium Ranger (Lightspeed Rescue), Battlizers (SPD's being back-ported to Dekaranger for a later movie-only use) and minor tweaks to the Ranger's gear (eg: Jungle Fury's Solar Morphers instead of Gekiranger's Geki Changers), most of the suits, items and fight footage in Power Rangers comes from the Super Sentai source created by Toei. El Nero Diablo (talk) 07:47, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception[edit]

I just realized that the critical reception has only one review. We may need to add some more reviews from sources such as The New York Times and Variety. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 09:22, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It currently has four reviews but it seems unbalanced and unduly positive for a film that was panned by critics. -- 109.77.195.51 (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]