Talk:Tupolev Tu-12

Tupolev Tu-12 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 20, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Aviation: Aircraft / Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the Soviet aviation task force.

Military history: Aviation / Russian & Soviet / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tupolev Tu-12/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CrowzRSA 01:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doin...

Not so much.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before I pass the article, I was wondering if there is any missing information, because there is only one article with prose. CrowzRSA 02:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't understand. What do you mean only one article with prose?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry, I meant section. I mean, most articles have at least two. CrowzRSA 21:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - I added a subsection.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - It does look a little better, but should the section be renamed History, and the section below it be made into a subsection named Development. Like this:

History

Development

Testing and evaluation

- - - - CrowzRSA 01:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        Seems rather elaborate for a five-paragraph article. And the testing is usually part of the development process.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:50, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        Okay. CrowzRSA 18:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Result: GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
CrowzRSA 18:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]