Talk:Tucana Dwarf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Other in the locution its location on the opposite side of the Milky Way from other Local Group galaxies implies that this "Dwarf", which is actually a dwarf galaxy and should be titled Tucana Dwarf Galaxy, is part of the Local Group. Gimli is a dwarf: the subject here is a galaxy. --Wetman (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Most of the other articles we have on dwarf galaxies are titled just "Such-and-such Dwarf", such as Antlia Dwarf, Fornax Dwarf, etc. I think the chances of getting these galaxies confused with short humanoids is pretty much minimal. Reyk YO! 04:16, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
cf Dwarf stars. Dropping galaxy renders these titles jargon. --Wetman (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I nominate this article for the stunning number and variety of forms deriving from "Isolated". Hilarleo Hey,L.E.O. 06:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tucana Dwarf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]