Talk:Tropospheric scatter

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tropospheric scatter article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cold War (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles

Military history: Intelligence / Technology / Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

" in which the receiver can be 'seen' by the transmitter." shouldn't this be the other way round? it is the receiver that can 'see' the transmitter DrBob127 (talk) 02:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't a "billion billionth" (billionth billionth?) equal to (1e-9)*(1e-9) = 1e-18 not 1e-12, which is actually "millionth millionth?" This ambiguity should be resolved. 209.112.210.141 (talk) 22:39, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

an explanation of how/why it works would be helpful here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.59.0.18 (talk • contribs)

Reversion[edit]

This version introduced a lot of good material, but also obliterated part of the existing article. I've reverted it for now. I may find dome time to try to integrate the information but it is uncited info. If there are editors more familiar with the topic who could do it, that would be great. -- Whpq (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although not familiar technically, I have done a little digging. The original article had all the bones and meat required, but was not too well written, but it certainly was far better than what was recently in the article. I have editted it to improve it a little but it still needs mnore work.Petebutt (talk) 01:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]