Talk:Trinity (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

In Denmark, the latin form Trinitatis is used for the Sunday following the Pentecost. The Sundays after that are named 1st Sunday after Trinitatis, 2nd Sunday after Trinitatis and so on until the end of the church year on the last Sunday after Trinitatis (the following Sunday being the 1st Sunday of the Advent and thus the first Sunday of the Church year). User:Sir48/engelsk

Merging Trinity College (disamb.) into Trinity (disamb.)[edit]

While the information on the TC page is more extensive, the Education section seems to handle it adequately. I'd retain the information from the TC page, however. Deadsalmon 01:08, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly wouldn't have thought to look for "Trinity College" under the article "Trinity". --PeterR 21:29, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect would be included, of course, along with one for the "Trinity University" pagename. Deadsalmon 01:46, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, don't do it. Here is how it should work. Trinity (disambiguation) should be a dab page including all Trinity Colleges. Trinity college shold be a dab page between all Trinity Colleges. Like it is now. Redirecting Trinity College to Trinity (disambiguation) confuses things and just makes a mess. Dunc|☺ 13:35, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm against it. The way the two pages are now works well. Hiding talk 20:23, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Dunc and Hiding. DreamGuy 20:33, September 5, 2005 (UTC)

Hello I find the redirection to a religious page very distracting. I could be looking for a number of topics in my case a nuclear bomb test. Trinity has become a name for a number of a things and theirfore there search should take you a disambiguation page instead of a religious one.

Are you suggesting that this page should be at Trinity, instead of at Trinity (disambiguation), with the current page at that location presumably moved to Holy Trinity or somesuch? Wikipedia:Disambiguation states that when a word has a primary meaning, that meaning should be used in the fashion the current Trinity page is. If you want that changed, you will have to argue that that definition is not the word's primary meaning. --Aquillion 14:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merging from Trinity School[edit]

Support -zappa.jak e (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The page is too long as it is. -- Usgnus 01:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well then should we just put a link to Trinity School in the place of all the schools currently there? It looks stupid with some schools on Trinity (disambiguation) but other schools only on Trinity School. -zappa.jak e (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. :-) -- Usgnus 14:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'Trinity Doctrine' would be more suitable; the trinity is an extra-biblical construction that is derived from early Christian fathers and remains a schema by which one can reconcile statements by God and Jesus, and Jesus' reference to the Holy Spirit (Holy Ghost). However, ‘the Trinity’ is never mentioned in the Hebrew Bible or New Testament; individuals who write commentary for “study Bibles”, with various footnotes do explain/deconstruct ‘the Trinity’.

Why isn't the Christian Holy Trinity mentioned?![edit]

I come here trying to do a religion project and all I find are links to the Hindu trinity and the trinity of some other religion I've never heard of. Why is the Holy Trinity (The one I would believe to be the most popular link here) not mentioned anywhere? Is Wikipedia trying to give a "global prospective" and censoring all refrecences of a "western" religion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.220.157 (talk) 22:39, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]