A fact from Treaty of Stettin (1630) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
nice article. Well cited, relatively clear, but needs some additional editing for the sake of clarity. For example, in the lead, a reference to "imperial" troops could have mean Swedish troops, but actually meant HRE troops. I've tweaked the lead somewhat, but the rest needs an edit from a good copy editor, or else the original author needs to go back after a short time. No reason why this couldn't be GA with only a little more effort.It would also help to have an additional map that is "simplified" and in English. Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is one of the most phenomenally overlinked articles I've ever seen. I wonder if anyone responsible for adding some of the many redundant links—including the multiple repetitions of Old Style and New Style dates—would care to defend the linking, before I embark on a long-overdue cull? Harfarhs (talk) 17:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
