This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Toyota Mark X ZiO article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 10:44, May 1, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
The Mark X Zio is just the wagon version of the Mark X. It is perfectly well covered in its own section of the Toyota Mark X article. There is no need for a separate Zio article - just a redirect to the Mark X article is enough. Stepho-wrs (talk) 01:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In light of further information recently added to the Mark X article, the Zio is quite different to the Mark X, so I have shifted the Zio info to it's own article at Toyota Mark X Zio (with a lowercase 'o' in 'Zio'). Stepho-wrs (talk) 04:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikipedia article on the Mark X implies it is for the Japanese market only. Although I did not search exhaustively, I don't see the Zio for sale in the USA. The two articles should state this for consistency.
Bcwilmot (talk) 00:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]