Talk:Touch Me in the Morning (song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 17 March 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Touch Me in the Morning to Touch Me in the Morning (song). The result of the discussion was moved.

Untitled[edit]

This song is notable for its multi-tracking. MM had Ross sing the song 12 times, and from each of the 12 recorded versions, he took the best part from each.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.188.131 (talk) 19:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 3 external links on Touch Me in the Morning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}). This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 March 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 21:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– Not primary topic. Per statistics, the viewing gap between the song and the parent album is very low at best, even when the song has more views than the album. If moved, the stats for the song may drop more. Regarding significance, one is no greater than the other, so that comes down to usage or viewership. George Ho (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 12:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. There are three entries listed upon the Touch Me in the Morning (disambiguation) page, with no indication that the song's renown overwhelms the combined notability of the album and the film. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 16:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support well spotted. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:IAR. This is a two-dab situation. Under the current situation about half the people searching with "touch me in the morning" are taken to the article they are seeking, and the other half is one (hatnote link) click away from the article they are seeking. In fact, it's likely the vast majority interested in one are interested in the other, which is probably why the page view counts are practically identical. So now we're going to create a third article (the dab page) which literally nobody wants, and send everyone there??? This is the height of bureaucratic insanity. No way does this proposed configuration improve anything for anyone. I think the section on primary topic needs to be revised to take these situations better into account, but for now, in the name of improving Wikipedia, we need to ignore it. Relisting requested. --В²C ☎ 05:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Relisting to see if we really should ignore the rules on this one. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 12:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support the dab page clearly has 3 entries, for 3 different articles aside from the dab page (which would make 4 pages). So move the dab page to the primary position -- 65.92.244.249 (talk) 05:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.