Talk:Timeline of electromagnetic theory

This redirect is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles

Physics: History

	Physics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
	This redirect is supported by History Taskforce.

Tesla[edit]

I removed Tesla to talk because it reads like a bit of a Tesla-fan POV-push. Tesla did no invent alternating-current (inventors are skipped in timeline). Tesla is not the primary inventor of the brushless alternating-current induction motor (inventors are skipped in timeline). Tesla did not invent AC polyphase systems (inventors are skipped in timeline). Tesla did not invent fluorescent lights (inventors are skipped in timeline). There were allot of theoreticians ahead of Tesla on what is mentioned. Claims for Tesla need to pass WP:UNDUE and be sorted out as to whether they are the first theories or just later practical applications. Also it has only on reference, a primary source. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Einstein[edit]

Quote from the article "1905: Albert Einstein demonstrates that Maxwell's equations are not required to describe electromagnetic radiation if Special Relativity is taken into account."

What was the intended meaning of this sentence near the end? SR is (of course) compatible with Maxwell's equations but does not make them less required. Bj norge (talk) 16:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I changed this sentence to what I belive was the intended meaning. Bj norge (talk) 09:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]