Talk:Tiffany Doggett/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 15:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article -- as it's an easier review being just a re-check of prior review and then hopefully should be resolved quite shortly. :) — Cirt (talk) 15:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: Hi, thanks for directing me with the template for archiving references. The three in question have now been archived (the two NY Times ones were quite awkward as they required a login but I believe that they are okay now, you may wish to check this). Thanks again. Spiderone 16:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 27, 2015, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass

2. Verifiable?: Pass

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Stable? Pass

6. Images?: Pass

Per prior GA Review, everything now looks successfully addressed by GA Nominator. My thanks to GA Nominator for such polite responsiveness to GA Reviewer recommendations, from the prior GA Review. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Cirt (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Thanks for giving this article (and myself) a second chance after I'd initially said I was too busy to address the issues. Spiderone 16:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]