Talk:Thomas White (Australian politician)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 21:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Looks pretty good
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- D. No copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused (see summary style):
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Just a few queries, nothing much:
- To my mind, he served with the Australian Army from 1911 to 1940, and with the RAAF from 1940 to 1944
- Yes, fair enough, perhaps for brevity we could represent in the infobox as:
- Service/branch....Australian Flying Corps (1914–20); Royal Australian Air Force (1940–44)
- Years of service..1911–44
- While we're in the infobox, do you think I should add the 6th Battalion under Commands held?
- What's with the "(Sir)"s?
- Shorthand for "(later Sir)", e.g. as in the ADB entry's "(Sir) Robert Menzies" -- though admittedly I didn't use it for him as he's likely to be much better known to the reader than Dicky Williams, George Jones, etc. I don't mind leaving it out for Jones and/or modifying for Williams if you think it's distracting.
- And the ellipses before footnote 23?
- Didn't add that snippet myself but was happy to leave it in -- I agree the ellipses aren't really necessary and will remove.
- You don't mention his work as an occasional anonymous correspondent for the London Morning Post (Daily Telegraph and Morning Post)
- I guess I didn't want to look like I was just paraphrasing the ADB entry (which was about the only source when I started work on the article) and it didn't strike me as particularly significant, but perhaps I have a blind spot...
- Should we mention the names of his daughters? (Lilian, Patricia, Shirley and Judith)
- I tend not to mention children's names if they're not (wiki)notable or unless they did something that's worth mentioning in the article.
- Or that his papers are in the National Library?
- Good point, will add.
Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Tks for reviewing! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- No worries. Passing now. Note that although the article is disambiguated with "(Australian politician)", I am placing it in the military section, as that's where you nominated it for review. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Tks Hawkeye -- while he may indeed be more notable as a politician than a military man, I think that having been an escapee and written a book about his experiences he might well have earned a place in the ADB even without his parliamentary career, and certainly the military occupies a fair bit of space in the article and sources, especially given his last ministry put him in political charge of the RAAF. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- No worries. Passing now. Note that although the article is disambiguated with "(Australian politician)", I am placing it in the military section, as that's where you nominated it for review. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)