Talk:Thomas Laycock (physiologist)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kennyling96. Peer reviewers: Brendanjhong.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Hi, I plan on adding more general information on Thomas Laycock and his contributions to medicine. Kennyling96 (talk) 03:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback[edit]

Hi Kenny. I thought that you did a good job discussing the key points of Laycock's life and career. I especially enjoyed the short anecdote about him having to have his knee amputated and thought it was interesting that Laycock used observation as his principal method of scientific inquiry. Also, I enjoyed reading about Laycock because his two major areas of study are related to both of my majors. Some small things you could fix is that "University College in London" should just be "University College London" with a hyperlink including all three of those words. Also, I noticed that you did not cite the last sentence of a lot of your paragraphs. I think that you could add more information about his teachings because they seem like interesting topics that could be expanded on even more. Overall, good job! Brendanjhong (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]