Talk:They'd Rather Be Right

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:ASFAug55.jpg[edit]

Image:ASFAug55.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Worst novel to win Hugo?[edit]

"It has often been considered the worst novel ever to win a Hugo." The "citation needed" tag has been there for two years. I've moved this to the talk page till someone can come up with a source for this claim.--Bfootdav (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scientology[edit]

The linked article by David Langford does not mention Scientology, much less "addressed conspiracy theories attributing They'd Rather Be Right's win to Scientology".  Mr JM  17:50, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uh? Scroll down. "Some paranoid fans blamed the weird 1955 Hugo result on Scientology. A likelier reason is that Mark Clifton was very popular for the short stories". Yes? DS (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I clicked the other link by Mr. Langford. Mea culpa  Mr JM  19:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]