Talk:There are unknown unknowns

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the There are unknown unknowns article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Philosophy: Epistemology / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Contemporary philosophy

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Regarding the Persian poem formerly in the article ...[edit]

The author of the translation used has written a blog entry on this topic. For better or worse, it is now part of the history of this article. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 22:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Derision[edit]

I came to this article looking for who it was who had derided this perfectly clear and meaningful expression, expecting to find a list of organs that had done so. I was surprised to find just a single mention of the Foot in Mouth award (and I have added a citation from that article). I've been looking, and I can't find any other examples. What I have found is articles like this one, which states that he was "universally derided", but not (so far) an example of such derision.

I realise that much of the derision is unreliable gunk on social media, but I would have thought that at least some of the tabloids would have jumped on the bandwagon. (If the Daily Mail did so, for example, even though that is not normally a reliable source, it would surely be a reliable source about itself.)

Can anybody find any other examples, or (even better) a reliable secondary source discussing such derision? ColinFine (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was a television show (either TV's Bloopers & Practical Jokes or probably patterned after it) that ran ca. 2005, and as far as I remember it now, everything else on the show was either somebody messing up or somebody attempting to be hunmorous -- Donald Rumsfeld's explanation of the un/knowns was the only straight non-blooper non-intentional-joke thing which was included... AnonMoos (talk) 11:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]