Talk:The Westminster Review

Magazines High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Sources for article expansion[edit]

This isn't necessarily a WP:RS but it does include info the current page is lacking and might be used to improve the article.

So... who wrote the articles?[edit]

Is it completely impossible to find out? or was it ever explained or written down somewhere? I'm specifically looking for the authorship of the first English usage of the word myth, which appeared in Article III of the Jan 1830 issue, reviewing a book on Buddhist demon worshippers in Sri Lanka. (If you have any way of finding this out, kindly alert me at my talk page.) — $Llywelyn II$ 12:46, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]