Talk:The Screwfly Solution (Masters of Horror)

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Eighth?[edit]

According to IMDB this is the 8th episode. I believe this is wrong, because on the [http://www.sho.com/site/mastersofhorror/home.do Showtime website] it lists them in chronological order. Xholyrelicx 19:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First time[edit]

Page says "The film was shot using a digital camera for the first time." ...first time for the director, or first time in Masters Of Horror, or what? 202.78.240.7 (talk) 02:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Screwfly.moh.jpg[edit]

Image:Screwfly.moh.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Some more sources[edit]

While looking for material on Homecoming I found the following:

Interview with Dante at The A.V. Club
Set visit, formatting goes screwy for me in Firefox

If I find anything else I'll drop it in so someone can work them into the article. (Emperor (talk) 02:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I totally have no idea what I'm doing editing here. But this line makes no freakin' sense:

"The film was shot using a digital camera for the first time."

Does this mean that the first time anyone ever used a digital camera was when they filmed this movie? Or that this was the very first movie ever filmed using a digital camera? Or that this was the first episode of Masters of Horror filmed on digital camera. Or that the makers of this episode were using a digital camera for the first time?

And "digital camera?" I'm assuming that this movie wasn't shot using stop motion. It looks live. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Revatman (talk • contribs) 05:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful interpretation[edit]

The article says "By December, all female life on Earth is presumed to have been exterminated, leaving the infected men to slowly die off." But I doubt that this is what is intended. Rather, Anne sees the aliens kill two men who were hunting her, take a brain sample; then she sees a meteor comes down and says rather grimly "make a wish". Then they flip to "December" (the next month) and a TV getting only static. The implication I take from this is that her wish was that all the killer men harrying her would be killed also - perhaps by a new disease somewhat like the last one - and that it had come true. I'm not going to put that in there because it's just my take on it, but I use it to illustrate that I don't think the current ending can be taken to mean what it says there without some kind of evidence. Wnt (talk) 08:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Screwfly Solution (Masters of Horror). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]