Talk:The Next of Kin

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	War films task force

Film: British / Documentary / War Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.

Moved from article text[edit]

This contributor Special:Contributions/Irritated User can attest that the Australian Army used The Next of Kin as part of its training up until the mid 1960s (having often viewed the film in this context). Next of Kin was distributed in 16mm format along with other training films. (By the 1960s, film prints, presumably of WW-II vintage, had deteriorated so much from repeated use that their soundtracks had become almost indistinguishable—to the extent that during screenings officers would demand total silence and the full concentration of viewers).

Note: this contributor is well aware of the self-referential nature of this footnote and seeks others to cite additional references.

--28bytes (talk) 02:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]