Talk:The Magilla Gorilla Show

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Hanna-Barbera Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Hanna-Barbera work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled[edit]

Would it make sense to an entry disambiguating "The Whole Magilla"'s origins from Purim#Reading_of_the_Megillah and this page?

As the external link says, it might stop urban legends :-)

I will defer to better writers :-)

An nice external link is currently at:

[| www.worldwidewords.org - Michael Quinion's World Wide Words - THE WHOLE MEGILLAH ]

Lent 16:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-- If he was really such a drain on Peebles' finances, why didn't he just give Ogee the damn thing and cut his losses?

Because then you wouldn't have a TV series. Wahkeenah 23:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Magilla.jpg[edit]

Image:Magilla.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hank McCoy[edit]

Isn't he too old to have been in highschool in the 70s? Yeah I know sliding timescale, but to THAT extent? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 03:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia[edit]

Some of the trivia information seems like it would be fairly easy to incorporate into the article. Other bits may prove more difficult, however. I've added at Trivia tag to that section to encourage editors with a little more time than me right now to work on incorporating this information into the main body of the article.--12.165.172.4 (talk) 11:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Segregation[edit]

I think the tone of the paragraph re racial segregation could be improved. Surely the creators of the program didn't intend to advocate support of segregation. The description makes it sound definitive. The critic cited has the full right to go out on that limb, but the graf as written makes it sound less like conjecture and more like established history.

Seigezunt (talk) 16:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)seigezunt[reply]