Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 18, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
January 29, 2007Good article nomineeListed
April 28, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 10, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
May 4, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
May 13, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 6, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
January 10, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 15, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
January 23, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
March 31, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

Plot modified[edit]

I have made some adjustments to a few sentences of the plot summary so that it makes more sense.

"Trill (The Legend of Zelda)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Trill (The Legend of Zelda). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 5#Trill (The Legend of Zelda) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 04:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remake vs Remaster - wrong link destination?[edit]

In the initial blurb of this article, the word "remaster" links to the article for Video game remake, despite there being a clear distinction between a "remake" and a "remaster" (which is actually discussed in the latter). Surely it would make more sense to instead link to Remaster (video game), which is a much more accurate description of the concept? --84.13.56.227 (talk) 06:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Sergecross73 msg me 14:54, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]