Talk:The Klingon Hamlet

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Klingon Hamlet article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Stephen Foley (Tuesday, 3 February 2009). "So is Wikipedia cracking up?:It was a utopian vision: an encyclopedia for the people, by the people. But eight years on, Wikipedia is plagued by endless hoaxes, and lurches from one cash crisis to another. Will it become a footnote in the history of the web?". The Independent. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

First Paragraph Error[edit]

It says that Klingon was spoken on the series. I don't think so.

The Wikipedia article on the Klingon language says: "Deliberately designed by Marc Okrand to be "alien", it has a number of typologically uncommon features. The language's basic sound, along with a few words, was first devised by actor James Doohan ("Scotty") for Star Trek: The Motion Picture. That film marked the first time the language had been heard on screen." Davidwbarker —Preceding undated comment added 16:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Is this some sort of joke? 86.140.150.99 12:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not. -- Pichote (talk) 13:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

Is the Klingon version literally a translation, with a few words changed here and there, or does it alter the plot (beyond giving e.g. swords and skulls Klingon names)? If so, is a plot summary warranted? I am confused as to how the plot holds up in Klingon, given that Mr Khamlet would presumably come across as unusually passive for a Klingon. Perhaps Klingons were more devious in the distant past. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 12:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is literally a translation with a few words changed here and there. The introduction plays with the passivity angle, but there's no need for a plot summary. (I'm Nick Nicholas btw) Opoudjis (talk) 00:55, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where does the name "Wil'yum Shek'sper" come from?[edit]

More specifically, is that an edit that somebody made up and added on this page to see if someone would notice?

That name does not follow established Klingon phonology nor spelling. Especially the apostrophes are suspect, because in Klingon, an apostrophe indicates a glottal occlusive [→ glottal stop —_User:Thnidu], which makes no sense to put between two consonants. The name "William Shakespeare", written according to Klingon spelling, would be "wIlIam SeHSpIr".Devil Master (talk) 14:00, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't presume to comment on the "correct" Klingon spelling; the spelling used in the published book is "Wil'yam Sheq'spir". Paul B (talk) 16:12, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many Klingon words are spelled differently in Standard (i.e., in English), including proper names: e.g., bat'leth vs. betleH, gagh vs. qagh, Kahless vs. qeyliS. So this variance is entirely consistent with canon.

The second "i" in "William" represents a "y" sound, which exists in Klingon; and although HSp is not a possible Klingon consonant cluster, the voiceless uvular affricate /q͡χ/, written Q , is a good loan-equivalent for English /ks/. So we could (ahem) reconstruct the proper Klingon spelling of the name as wIlyam SeQpIr, representing the pronunciation /wɪl.jɑm.ʂɛq͡χ.pɪr/.

However, as Paul B quite rightly points out, that's beside the point here. Wikipedia is not a Klingon creative project, and this page reports on the book as it exists. --Thnidu (talk) 08:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Klingon Hamlet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130507162823/http://www.kli.org/stuff/projects.html to http://www.kli.org/stuff/projects.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]