Talk:The Kingmaker (audio drama)

This page was proposed for deletion by Torpedoi (talk · contribs) on 22 November 2023.

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Untitled[edit]

Tempted to make wikilinks in the cast last, but probably too spoilerish? Morwen - Talk 00:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seyton and Clarrie would be massive spoilers, but it is underneath the spoiler tag.. Tim! 16:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why wasn't Tom Baker asked to play his Doctor?[edit]

Why was Jon Culshaw asked to play the fourth Doctor rather than Tom Baker?

Because Tom Baker has continually refused to play in the audios. --Johan _{(speak to me, human)} ^{(yes i've been here)} —Preceding comment was added at 20:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception…[edit]

The negative tone of the critical reception section seems a might over-powering, given that it has just one review by a person who may or may not have anything of value to say (it could be original research, after all). Personally I found the play to be enormously enjoyable, and well worth the listen: interesting characters, a decent mystery to it all, and the change in tone about which the reviewer spoke being well-executed, to keep things interesting (added to which the “Northern” accent of Richard was an even more spot on impersonation (of Ninth Doctor actor Christopher Eccleston) than Culshaw’s Tom Baker)! Has anyone seen any other reviews or indications of a positive reception for this drama (e.g. how did it fare in the Doctor Who Magazine reader poll)? Jock123 (talk) 16:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]