Talk:The King Must Die

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Still just Stub[edit]

Still relevant no verifiability, references, clear proofs of notability. These really should be added, the article is really a Start at least but without any referencing to support the article it is making a point that we return the Stub rating. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 07:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also if the Stub is genuinely not relevant anymore is should be rerated not just have the WikiProject banner removed. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 07:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

I'm wondering, is it permissible to include references that are from Sparknotes or Cliffsnotes? Is that considered verifiable? User:Massyold 19:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, as long as the specific source is noted; let me know if you need any help formatting references. TAnthony 01:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

``Theseus' brutality to women``

I have added a couple of sentences indicating Theseus' brutality to women - a subject either not seen or avoided. I accept that he is a patriarchal King of Ancient Greece, but his attitude towards women is sporaidically brutal - as when he contemplates raping Persephone as a punismnent for her making him a powerless consort - and when he threatens to murder his father's 'war prize' for having a wandering eye, and I think today this should be acknowledged, though it would not have aroused comment in the 1960's. Thanks Jessica

````

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessica Holsgrove (talk • contribs) 11:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]