Talk:The Herald-Sun (Durham, North Carolina)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edits by Herald-Sun Staff[edit]

It appears that someone at The Herald-Sun has been making unverified statements and editorial comments about the current operations under the Paxton Media Group and under the former owners. While I think it's fantastic that the subjects of Wikipedia articles actively participate in the creation of Wiki content, it does a disservice to the community when they (apparently) selectively edit for their benefit and do so as an "anonymous" user.

This was added (inappropriately) to the article by an anonymous user at the end of the Website section, but the point is still valid (if worded inflammatorily):

REALITY CHECK: The last sentence in the foregoing paragraph

At this point the company finally implemented widespread Web training, which it failed to do under its previous ownership, and the site not only continues to be updated throughout the day, the number of postings has grown dramatically as more editors are able to work with the site.

— Added by an anonymous user within The Herald-Sun's IP block on 20 July, 2007

is rubbish, and probably written by the person who, at the behest of Paxton's nickle-graspers, helped de-content the original award-winning site much the same as The Herald-Sun itself. The current page is poorly organized and dominated by ads and static links to standing features. Unfortunately, the original site no longer exists and can't be used to illustrate the fallacy that the paper's Web presence has been in any way "improved." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.122.150 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 15 August 2007

I've gone through and tagged the sections that have unverified or unsourced references, as well as restoring a previously deleted reference that was producing an error. — Mustang_DVS (talk|contribs) 15:47, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate[edit]

This piece is extremely slanted and inaccurate. The Herald-Sun actually has a good deal less wire content than under its previous ownership, its Web site is updated around the clock as news dictates and it continues to win awards for its excellent reporting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.65.207.170 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 31 January 2007

As the contributor who got this article off-the-ground, I must respectfully disagree.

As to the website, local election results in November 2006 were not posted until the following day, despite up-to-the-minute coverage by WRAL and the N&O, the March 2007 windstorms and the damage and outages caused were not covered until the next day, and even the dismissal of charges against the Duke lacrosse defendants was not covered until the next day.

AP and other syndicated stories now comprise 80-90 percent of the front page and most of the "A" section; syndicated columnists fill the editorial pages, with only anonymous, single paragraph mini-editorials addressing local issues.

If what's been said is factually incorrect -- please register an account and correct the mistakes, so long as you cite your sources. I'm happy to be proven wrong, so long as it's fact and not opinion. — Mustang_DVS (talk|contribs) 21:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Firings[edit]

Restored notation of photographer Taylor's and cartoonist Cole's firings; these were noted in The Independent's article, "Paxton May Have Overpaid For Herald-Sun." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.43.22.100 (talk) 19:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Herald-Sun masthead.png[edit]

Image:The Herald-Sun masthead.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Herald-Sun front page.jpg[edit]

Image:The Herald-Sun front page.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of this article[edit]

This article in its present form omits and selectively includes facts in a way that makes it appear biased. Please help by rewriting this article to present an neutral point of view (NPOV) in keeping with Wikipedia's standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.106.191.194 (talk) 14:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Herald-Sun (Durham, North Carolina). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Herald-Sun (Durham, North Carolina). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Herald-Sun_(Durham,_North_Carolina)&oldid=1210588143"