Talk:The Ghost Monument

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Ghost Monument article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

RE: Easter Egg links[edit]

Please remember that links should be as transparent as possible. See WP:EGG and WP:EASTEREGG. DonQuixote (talk) 14:07, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Does the text "After arriving in deep space" link to an article directly concerning arriving in deep space? If not, it should not be linked. -- Alex^TW 14:10, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RevDel[edit]

There were copyright violations in the plot section, with copypasting from this site: tragicalhistorytour. I don't know which revisions to revision delete but any revision that was made while the copyrighted plot section was in the article would suffice (see article history). JC7V-talk 07:39, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JC7V7DC5768, I believe you have it backwards. The website linked has copied the plot summary from this article after it was added here by a multitude of summaries. Please check the article history before incorrectly tagging articles. Website was last updated 28 October (per website). Summary was added 15 October. Exactly the same copy-paste from Wikipedia to the website for the first, third and fourth episodes. Copy-paste from Wikipedia to the website is clear given the identical formatting of the cast list that's been copied as well. -- Alex^TW 07:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To the reviewing admin: false positive cleared up. -- Alex^TW 08:13, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on... I checked the link to that website, and I see no plot summaries in it, only photos of the episode, including behind-the-scenes shots. Where on earth, does that site have summaries matching those in the articles for the Eleventh series? GUtt01 (talk) 18:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, wait... The respective links - you have to click on the "i" on the page to see that info. But I agree with Alex, I can't see why this would have been copypasted from that site. I was the editor who made the original summary before it was edited after its creation. GUtt01 (talk) 18:18, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can now definitely agree with Alex that this argument got things backwards. It seems the site copyedits the summaries from Wikipedia - just checked the site's page for the fifth episode of this series and found it stating the summary for the fourth episode, not the fifth (this will relate to website's page for 11 November 2018). GUtt01 (talk) 23:30, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JC7V7DC5768, I'm scanning rather than fully reading for comprehension but it sounds like there's some agreement that this is a false positive. if so, could the editor who added the rev del template remove it? S Philbrick (Talk) 16:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sphilbrick, I meant to remove it after I resolved the issue with Alex last week but I forgot. I am sorry. False positive. JC7V-talk 16:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JC7V7DC5768, No problem, I just thought it be better for you to remove it. Thanks. S Philbrick (Talk) 16:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]