Talk:The Day of the Jackal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Split the article[edit]

This should be split into a film article by itself.Fistful of Questions 03:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Split - Most plays/films adaptations have separate articles.--Gkklein 22:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I have moved the information about the film to The Day of the Jackal (film). Count de Ville 04:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FrederickForsyth TheDayOfTheJackal.jpg[edit]

Image:FrederickForsyth TheDayOfTheJackal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FrederickForsyth TheDayOfTheJackal.jpg[edit]

Image:FrederickForsyth TheDayOfTheJackal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 21:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charges of homophobia[edit]

This "criticism" is very much minor in the context of the novel and its reception generally. It simply repeats verbatim the criticism of one particular perspective based on a very minor event in the novel. The WP project/ Novels has a suggested article structure here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Novels/ArticleTemplate.

Perhaps a line or two of this current section might be incorporated into a section called "Literary Signifance and Reception". AleXd (talk) 10:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone confirm that this book even exists? I tried to find out whether "consumated" is spelt that way in the original, but Amazon, Google Books, and WorldCat have nothing, nor could I find out anything about who Alan B. Higgs is. It would appear to be self-published. - Cal Engime (talk) 19:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assassination attempt location[edit]

The article currently mentions the August assassination attempt being "along the Avenue de la Liberation in Paris". The de Gaulle article, the Petit-Clamart article and the Jean Bastien-Thiry article mention that famous attempt taking place at Petit-Clamart. Also, I vaguely remember reading once that the assassination scene in the movie (and the book?) is a dramatized amalgamation of several attempts on de Gaulle's life. It would be good to clarify this I think. – JBarta (talk) 16:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. There is an "Avenue de la Liberation" in Clamart. Unfortunately for me, there is one in Saint-Étienne as well... and that's where my mistake was. – JBarta (talk) 16:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Citroen helps de Gaulle survive assassination attempt" The History Channel "This Day in History: August 22, 1962":
"In August 1962, a group called the OAS (Secret Army Organization in English) plotted an assassination attempt on President De Gaulle, who they believed had betrayed France by giving up Algeria (in northern Africa) to Algerian nationalists. Near dusk on August 22, 1962, De Gaulle and his wife were riding from the Elysee Palace to Orly Airport. As his black Citroen DS sped along the Avenue de la Liberation in Paris at 70 miles per hour, 12 OAS gunmen opened fire on the car. A hail of 140 bullets, most of them coming from behind, killed two of the president's motorcycle bodyguards, shattered the car's rear window and punctured all four of its tires." Centpacrr (talk) 16:51, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Like I said... my mistake. Actually it seems there are multiple Avenue de la Liberation's around France. I might be slow... but I get there eventually ;-) – JBarta (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I suppose if we wanted to put a fine point on it, we might say the assassination attempt was in "Petit-Clamart, a suburb of Paris". – JBarta (talk) 17:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assassination attempt failure reason[edit]

Day of the Jackal claims that Bastien-Thiry consulted a 1961 calendar and determined that dusk fell on 22nd August at 8:35; had he consulted a 1962 calendar he would have determined that on 22nd August 1962, dusk fell at 8:10, 25 minutes earlier and a crucial error. This is specious: the difference between sunset times for the same day on two consecutive years is never more than a few minutes. Specifically, local sunset in Paris on 1961-08-22 was 20:53:39 (more or less, depending on precise longitude) and on 1962-08-22 was 20:54:08, about 30 seconds difference. Evaluist (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Astrophysicist here. Was listening to the audiobook just now and was shocked to hear this error in this otherwise excellent tale. Jim77742 (talk) 07:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Day of the Jackal/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Classed as a stub promarily because much of this combined article appears to refer to the film. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 14:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 08:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Rome hotel - or Austrian?[edit]

This is a note more for myself, but other editors are welcome (obviously) to comment - I thought the hotel the OAS barricaded themselves into was in Austria - the Pension Kleist? Or is that only where they stay while waiting to meet the Jackal? Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kleist was where they met the Jackal and Rome was where they barricaded themselves in.89.207.1.20 (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Day of the Jackal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"TDOTJ" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect TDOTJ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 11 § TDOTJ until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 03:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Day_of_the_Jackal&oldid=1218335852"