Talk:The Crusade (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Harsh vocals[edit]

"The album marks a departure from screamed vocals into more Thrash metalesque Metallica influenced vocals"

Um, has it been confirmed that the entire album will not involve harsh vocals?

Yeah it has. Theres only like 2 or 3 lines on the whole album that are screamed according to Paolo

then why dose the genre say "metalcore"

shut up. he said in an interview with metal hammer. the genre says metalcore becaus etrivium hates change it to this.

Trivium genre arguments smell. They were essentially metalcore now theyre probably thrash and who knows next album. NWOAHM maybe?

There is a bootleg of the vid of "Entrance of the Conflagration" floating around at the moment if its relevent enough to add to the article. If not ah well

¿Thrash Metal?[edit]

I love Trivium, and I know that the "The Crusade" Album is behind the old thrahs metal or post trash, but it isn't real thrash metal, It's only Swedcore with Thrash Metal! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.90.238.137 (talk) 04:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Eh: it's close enough to Thrash =P And why has the "one acoustic song" piece of info been put back up? The album was released last year and there is clearly no acoustic songs on it

blah blah =]

It definitely has elements thrash metal, and so it having that as a tag seems fine to me. But it needs to have something else, illustrating that it isn't just thrash by any means. I'm fine with "Heavy metal". It's actually got quite a lot in common with power metal too, more so than thrash IMO. Prophaniti (talk) 18:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of it is thrash metal, so heavy metal's perfectly fine as a secondary genre. "Entrance of the Conflagration" and "And Sadness Will Sear" are not thrash metal songs. -MetalKommandant (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this is NOT thrash metal, at all. Thrash metal is Death Angel, Overkill, Testament (they experimented with some death metal so they arent pure thrash), this is metalcore. I heard 3 songs on this album and none of them were thrash at all this is a horribly MISLEADING label, trivium is NOT thrash metal at all —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.148.88.135 (talk) 17:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yeah no metalcore at all on this album, no breakdowns, mabe 2 songs with two lines of screaming. Entrence of the Conflagration reminds me of Testament's More than meets the Eye —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.238.231.183 (talk) 09:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Metal[edit]

Where in that review did we get anything about "alternative metal"? I don't see it. References to Metallica doesn't do it. If you think this album is alternative metal, you really have a poor understanding of NWOAHM. -MetalKommandant (talk) 06:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

metalcore[edit]

About 2-3 lines screamed, no breakdowns... How is this even remotly a metalcore album? Can you cite refrences? 141.132.103.161 (talk) 01:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy Metal[edit]

I do agree that this album is mostly Thrash Metal... But the songs; The Rising, Anthem (We are the Fire) and Sadness will Sear aren't thrash metal... ie, slower place, less agressive vocal style etc... Adding Heavy Metal as a secondary genre would be good to cover these songs Dims25 (talk) 23:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Crusade (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080222001821/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=59097 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=59097

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]