Talk:Thale (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Added the following in the section which covers the critical reception:

On the other hand, Rottentomatoes is less positive. Five out of ten critics gave the movie a positive review (50% on the 'Tomatometer'). The audience on that website was even less positive. It has a 37% approval rating out of 1189 user ratings. IMDB rates the movie unfavorably with a score of 5,4/10 from 2260 users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.169.106.131 (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect removal of feedback from reliable sources[edit]

I just undid a removal. The editor stated that blogs aren't reliable sources, but also removed criticism from perfect valid sources. I.e. Rottentomatoes and IMDB are perfectly fine sources. It is fishy if only positive feedback is left untouched whilst actual ratings from big and reliable sources are removed. Gretchen Mädelnick (talk) 01:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And again I undid the removal of bad reviews from IMDB and Rottentomatoes. Read this first before dismissing these references as mere blogs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Review_aggregators Gretchen Mädelnick (talk) 17:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A listing of user ratings on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes is NOT a reliable source. I'm guessing this "specialist site" Wordpress blog mentioned in the article is yours? Blogs are not reliable sources.Neptune's Trident (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No the Worpress site wasn't mine. I removed it now. But kept Rottentomatoes and IMDB. Didn't notice the Wordpress thing. Now on to IMDB and RT, If you don't agree with Wikipedia:Review_aggregators, then fight that. But don't change random Wiki movie entries. I see you made it a hobby of yours to remove 'blogs' as references, but that Wiki-essay clearly states that aggregators can be used in the proper context. I'm using the aggregated ratings/values from accepted aggregators ; can't be more on topic. By the way, I see you fiddled with the movie Serenity but left the aggregators over there untouched. Double standards? Gretchen Mädelnick (talk) 16:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]