Talk:Teleomorph, anamorph and holomorph

Fungi High‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

I removed the "unreferenced" tag as an unnecessary feature. Not everything needs to be referenced if actually written by an expert. I am an authority on this topic. Additionally, the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature was linked - and it is an essential reference.Heliocybe 12:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

International Something Congress?[edit]

Currently there's reference to nomenclature rules being set by the International Mycology Association at an International Botanical Congress, and then in the next paragraph a reference to "subsequent International Mycological Congresses" which is currently a red link, and also an unlinked mention of another International Botanical Congress. I'd like to help with the red link but I didn't know whether these refer to one and the same, or two different series of mycological conferences. - Egmonster (talk) 20:44, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not that easy[edit]

What if within the species complex of an ascomycetous mold there is one genetic lineage capable of producing fruiting bodies, and another incapable? According to current definition, both are anamorphs as far as they form only mitospores. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20708436/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivan Pchelin (talk • contribs) 12:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]