Talk:Tea Leaf Green

Serious Editing Needed[edit]

This wiki entry is basically an extended advertisement for the band. Don't get me wrong I love Tea Leaf Green, and I think they deserve better than some dinky, gimmicky entry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.190.174.230 (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep[edit]

Keep the f***ing article for Ch**st sake!--Gephart 06:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article[edit]

This band does not seem to meet any of the notable musician requirements. In addition, section of it read like an advertisement for the band's merchandise. There is no reason to keep it. --Emtilt 4 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree too. Moe ron is right jambands suck, good thing his moniker isn't taken from a jamband. This band definitely does not have musicians in it. I've seen them and they make music with peanut butter and mcdonalds cheeseburgers and weird stuff like that, not a single "real" instrument in sight. These guys should die like dogs for trying to do such a thing as make music for people. The nerve. And oh yeah they've never charted, sharted maybe, but never charted. Only bands like fall out boy deserve to exist, even online in and even here in wikipedia.I'm smart and know everything about stuff and I rule in anonymous land. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.55.164 (talk) 19:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Why is there all this Jam Band clutter on wikipedia? Few or any of these bands have even charted and/or have any relevancy to music history. Interesting that they have a dvd coming out by an unknown son of a Grateful Dead member and that this is an obvious attempt at cross promotion. This is strictly MySpace material and should be deleted.Peak

If you would like to nominate the page for deletion, please see WP:AFD. It will most likely stay, though, since it meets the criteria for notability based on Wikipedia:Notability (music). -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 00:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It will most likely stay because you are mistreating wikikpedia and trying to promote TLG anyway possible. This is an unknown band that has not charted. The Dandy Warhols for example have a much more illustrious career and their page is actually smaller. Trying to cross promote is via Grateful Dead kids and other Jam bands degrades Wikipedia.-Peak

I am did not create this page and have no investment in it, though I tried to help clean it up a few months ago. I am glad you took out the WP:POV stuff, though. The band has CDs and DVDs listed on Amazon.com, Allmusic.com, and in many Best Buy and Circuit City stores, so they are not an "unknown" band. -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 02:18, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are countless bands on Amazon that are unknown! One has to seriously wonder why is there is inundation of Jamband references now? While this may be important in their community this has scant relevancy to Wikipedia--if any. These are bands and relations that deserve-at the most, two line references, if any. peakdetector 10/9/06

Thank You[edit]

Many laudations to the person or people who have helped to fix up and clean up this article. It now looks worthy of a wiki article, so thanks to everyone to contributed.--Geppy 02:51, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It only looks cleaned up though. Writing is pretty much all wikipedia is and it currently reads as promotional for fans. That's why its tagged for tone (i.e. "stellar" is considered a peacock term). It also needs references; being 'stellar' there are probably 'tons'. - Steve3849 ^talk 00:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tea Leaf Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]