Talk:Tata OneCAT

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More efficient than hybrids/no emissions?[edit]

You need to plug this car in to run the air compressor -> the electrical power is generated by some sort of power plant, likely coal or oil -> power plants generate emissions (or in the case of a nuclear plant, nuclear waste). The batteries in hybrid cars essentially derive their energy from the internal combustion engine in the car; this compressed air car derives its energy (stored air) from a oil/coal/nuclear power plant. You shouldn't say this car is more efficient than a hybrid without considering this fact, and examining the net emissions produced in both cases. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.201.219.76 (talk) 17:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is terrible[edit]

Tata Motors has no mention of this vehicle on their site. How do we know it's going into production? And what does "a 2001 trunk" mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazy coyote (talk • contribs) 04:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like 200 l (liter) trunk. Does anyone know how many Decibels of noise the driver or the environment is subjected to? The idea in general sounds great, but we'll see if it actually makes it to the U.S. market.

WriterHound (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed outdated speculations[edit]

The article stated a price and that the production of the car would be in early 2009. Since the prototype is not mentioned on TATA nor on MDI website, we can assume that production is not scheduled for the upcoming future. If reliable data from the manufacturer is available it can be inserted into the article. Neozoon 23:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tata OneCAT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]