Talk:Tamsin Egerton

Toplessness and legality

I've removed this statement:

Interestingly she performed several topless scenes in the film Keeping Mum at an age below that of eighteen. Which is illegal in most countries.

This seems somewhat dubious. Perhaps depiction of toplessness is illegal in under-eighteens in the USA and some other countries, but this cannot be extended to the rest of the world. --Tony Sidaway 04:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't know what state-law would be in the US, but there would be 50 different laws in the US, let alone abroad. Also, as the film is British, the filming would fall under our jurisdiction, which allows nudity at 16. I should point out this was part of the joke when she's caught by her mum in the van during Keeping Mum with the line about being 17 and it being legal for a year. Cheerio, Roche-Kerr 23:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

It can't have been too much problematic in even the US, as the movie aired there too, AFAIK in an uncut form. She was 16 at the time by the way, and she was legally allowed to do that stuff even without parental consent according to UK laws. And one indeed also need to make the distinction between nudity and pornography here. Artistic nudity like in this case is often very relaxed, and I've seen prepubescent children star in such cases. -- Northgrove 12:53, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

The Abbey

has apparently been cancelled. If anyone has a better source (for it being either on or off), please add. Amo (talk) 18:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Knife Edge

The link goes to the Mallory Blackman novel but I think the film is something completely different! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matty3891 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

File:Tamsin Egerton .jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Tamsin Egerton .jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tamsin Egerton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091207031658/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23779851-the-saints-and-sinners-of-st-trinians.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23779851-the-saints-and-sinners-of-st-trinians.do

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)