Talk:Table of prophets of Abrahamic religions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Under Islam Section, Last Prophet Is Muhammad pbuh, please remove others[edit]

This page of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_prophets_of_Abrahamic_religions have incorrectly shown entry of Ahmadya/Qadyani false leaders and others self claimed, as a prophets of Abrahamic Religion, where fact is after Islam's last prophet which is Prophet Muhammad pbuh there should be no entry hence it is requested to please remove every entry placed after this. 119.153.53.34 (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"where fact is" There is nothing factual about religious beliefs, just different religious views. Dimadick (talk) 19:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is a fact that most Muslims consider Mohammed the "seal of the prophets' and the very last one.-2A00:23EE:1018:AD0C:D5B6:2AED:F036:91A6 (talk) 20:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sikhs[edit]

As a derivative of Islam, shouldn't the Sikhs be here too? -2A00:23EE:1018:AD0C:D5B6:2AED:F036:91A6 (talk) 20:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sikhs aren't derivatives of Islam Ameerthewolf (talk to me 18:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Give Mormonism their own collumn? (Also, Ishmael is portrayed in a negative sense in Christianity and at least some Jewish traditions, not exactly a prophet)[edit]

I think this article is defunct anyway La'ayiv (talk) 22:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Ahmadiyya have their own collumn?[edit]

I think the Ahmadiyya should have their own column because they are not Muslims. They also have lots of prophets that are not in Islam. If the Bahai'is and the Druze have their separate columns, the Ahmadiyya should too. Ameerthewolf (talk) 18:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]