Talk:Swashbuckler

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Swashbuckler article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: British / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

Military history: Medieval / Napoleonic era C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Movie actors[edit]

Why not mention too : Stewart Granger ( baffling duel in "Scaramouche") - and A. Banderas ( "Zorro"). And not so widely known , but a star in France , Alain Delon ( "The black tulip" I963 - "Zorro" I975 ...) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.168.130.125 (talk • contribs) 10:58, 11 December 2007

Because Zorro is the swashbuckler, not Banderas. The only actors you could add are the ones that almost only played swashbuckling roles, like Fairbanks and Flynn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.131.149.222 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 29 March 2008

James Bond[edit]

Why would he be a swashbuckler? He doesnt have any characterics, except being a womanizer.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.131.149.222 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 29 March 2008

He seems to have all the characteristics except instead of swords he noisily uses cars and other things. Green Arrow seems to more clearly be a swashbuckler except for his choice of the kind of blade. -- SEWilco (talk) 02:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana Jones[edit]

Surely he is a swashbuckler? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.28.117 (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

seconded - so is Han Solo! 58.246.77.14 (talk) 01:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"As well"[edit]

Why is there "(as well)" after Will Turner? Does not strike me as particularly encyclopedic language. -Jickyincognito (talk) 23:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

authors[edit]

Simon Cowell? I see no evidence of this in his linked page, nor in a cursory search of Amazon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.207.206.238 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add Lagardère?[edit]

If Paul Féval is going to be listed as an Author, shouldn't his most famous swordmaster character be listed? I mean, if we're listing multiple characters from The Princess Bride...

Jmbrowne (talk) 15:30, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that Swashbuckler (list) be merged into Swashbuckler. I think that the content in the Swashbuckler (list) article can easily be explained in the context of Swashbuckler, and the Swashbuckler (list) article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Swashbuckler will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned.Alanl (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They used to be one but were seperated I no not why?REVUpminster (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The list article currently has no references, so a merge is probably warranted. It might be possible to make the list into a better referenced article capable of standing on its own, however. - Sangrolu (talk) 20:18, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I second that they should be merged. (Peeteygirl (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Medical[edit]

as usual, this medical section lacks anything for the layperson in remotely normal english and is therefore completely incomprehesible to 99% of readers.

IceDragon64 (talk) 21:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]