Talk:Suzuki Bolan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Let's Make a page for this Chunk Beast![edit]

Let's all contribute to make this page, a better place! Arotparaarms (talk) 12:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible source for sales numbers[edit]

Yearly reports dating back to 2007 from Pakistan Automotive Manufacturers Association, also available in chart format. Broc (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@750h+ please check out the sources above. The table displays the data from June because that's how the PAMA reports (from June to June instead of for a calendar year). If you want to improve it, let's discuss, but the numbers check out with the official ones from PAMA. Broc (talk) 13:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Alright @Broc, I'll check it out! Arotparaarms (talk) 07:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a code of a Wiki table I'll use,
== Financial Performance ==
Year ended Revenue (PKR thousand) Operating income (PKR thousand) Net income (PKR thousand) Total assets (PKR thousand) Total equity (PKR thousand)
31 December 2012[1] Increase58,531,137 Increase1,499,760 Increase978,022 Decrease21,384,864 Increase15,800,884
31 December 2013[2] Decrease51,061,333 Increase2,353,439 Increase1,849,357 Increase23,811,277 Increase17,645,158
31 December 2014[3] Increase53,664,947 Increase2,623,394 Increase1,921,894 Increase28,354,159 Increase19,236,682
31 December 2015[4] Increase84,548,757 Increase8,685,171 Increase5,842,671 Increase37,451,987 Increase24,679,238
31 December 2016[5] Decrease76,516,040 Decrease4,415,236 Decrease2,772,635 Increase37,851,965 Increase26,216,907
31 December 2017[6] Increase101,811,611 Increase5,619,214 Increase3,825,821 Increase50,910,467 Increase29,549,716
31 December 2018[7] Increase119,853,898 Decrease2,082,936 Decrease1,298,108 Increase61,509,849 Decrease29,232,865
31 December 2019[8] Decrease116,548,013 Decrease(4,951,744) Decrease(2,920,485) Increase77,659,826 Decrease25,950,886
31 December 2020[9] Decrease42,384,482 Increase(1,888,054) Increase(1,378,115) Decrease66,647,356 Decrease24,292,441
31 December 2021[9] Increase160,082,255 Increase3,795,407 Increase2,679,467 Increase91,989,970 Increase26,826,197
31 December 2022[10] Increase202,466,737 Decrease(3,142,540) Decrease(6,336,922) Increase110,084,368 Decrease19,770,548
  1. ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2012" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2012. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  2. ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2013" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  3. ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2014" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  4. ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2015" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2015. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  5. ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2016" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2016. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  6. ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2017" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  7. ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2018" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2018. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  8. ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2019" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2019. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  9. ^ a b "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2021" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2021. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  10. ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2022" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2022. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
I'm going to change it and get the numbers of the Bolan in there,
Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 07:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added a Table :D
Thanks for providing the sources!
Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 08:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should I remove the "expansion" Banner?[edit]

The article is now matured and is only just a stub, it does need cleanup though, Arotparaarms (talk) 14:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Project Banner[edit]

{{WikiProject Automobiles |class= C |importance= low}}

Is my estimated ranking for the Suzuki Bolan Am I correct or is it higher/Lower? Arotparaarms (talk) 10:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please look over the assessment criteria, and maybe read some B-class articles to see how much content they have and how they are written. This article in its current state is far too sparse and lacking a lot of important information. --Sable232 (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Thanks for the info mate!
I guess I'll rate it "C" until further notice!
Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 14:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image for the Suzuki Ravi[edit]

Is there an image falling under Fair use of the Suzuki Ravi? The closest to the ravi is this [[1]] car..... Arotparaarms (talk) 00:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the sales number[edit]

@750h+ You removed a large chunk of the sales, I don’t think the sales are saying they were bought on 1 June alone, but between 1 June of that year and the precious. Also, I think 1 June isn’t random, some companies use it as a fiscal year. VirtualVagabond (talk) 13:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • previous
VirtualVagabond (talk) 13:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that needs to be specified if so. 750h+ (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
750h+ Then go ahead and specify it. But please check the sources before removing large chunks of material. Broc (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That burden isn’t on me, it is on the large contributors of the page. I’d rather just merge this quite unremarkable car back into the Suzuki Carry page. 750h+ (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, What about the Suzuki Ravi?[edit]

Should we expand on the Ravi's section or give it a mention and make a whole new article? Arotparaarms (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arotparaarms an article is only justified if there is substantial material. Right now there is only a small section. Considering that Suzuki Ravi already redirects here, I would leave it as it is. If while editing you realize that the section on the Ravi has become long enough to warrant its own article, you can proceed with the move then. Broc (talk) 10:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes @Broc, you're right it doesn't require an article, but the main point is that the section needs to be bigger, I am working on it and hope you can too,
Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 16:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]