This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Then don't fix it...Modernist (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My idea was that this lovely woman is not exacly well represented. Those scans are bad. Really bad quality, it does not give the artwork their potential, if I could fix that -that would be different, so from my point of view it is broken. I think it presents all scans we have on her, bad as well as good ones. Also, could you <<KINDLY stop reverting my changes, and discuss them with me instead, please. You are the person and Ewulp that just simply revert changes with no discussions. Try to think about that many times there is a good reason behind it, I am not a vandal or an idiot, you should have noticed by now hopefully. I an trying to ameliorate most articles. Hafspajen (talk) 19:19, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The gallery looks awful, the colors are crashing with each other and the scans are unacceptable low quality. It is much better without them than with them, that is why I said less is more. WILL YOU discuss things with me about this issue, instead of reverting me all the time? It is rude to revert instead of discuss. The article soon will have a lot of hits, because a picture is getting featured, here, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Édouard MANET - La Nymphe surprise - Google Art Project.jpg. If you have anything against this version - tell me what the issue is, please. Hafspajen (talk) 19:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I re-added the two images that you deleted without discussion with me. When I pretty much created this article - the purpose was to include as many paintings of Mme. Manet as we had available. You unilaterally changed this article; as you do with many articles that others have worked on for years, without discussion; so if you don't mind - rudeness works both ways. The two paintings that you deleted are perfectly good images, one is used in the German version and the other is an excellent example of a late painterly Manet, please leave them alone...Modernist (talk) 22:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
