Talk:Surplus product

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

As the author of the article I have introduced more references, and removed the sources tag. The articles describes in simple terms a fairly uncontroversial concept in Marxian theory and is probably OK as it stands - User:Jurriaan 16 May 2007

I have begun to format the references properly in footnotes. User:Jurriaan 17 October 2011 1:41 (UTC)

Beware of Bob Rayner's "editing"[edit]

The scam editor Bob Rayner User:Bobrayner specializes in cutting large bits out of articles that he doesn't like, for no reason at all or for some spurious reason. He doesn't understand anything about the subjectmatter. The article then has to be reset to what is was before his vandalism. This article is still being worked on from time to time and Rayner's destructive habits are unwanted here. Jurriaan (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The editor Bob Rayner is at it again. Hrrmph. We will have to put in extra effort to undo his destructive edits.Jurriaan (talk) 00:28, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism accusation[edit]

I have noticed in the archive annex of this article, there is a comment by an editor who claims that he "found the first few paragraphs of this article were taken directly from the book Inequality and Global Supra-surplus Capitalism, without acknowledgement. This editor ventured to insert a citation to the relevant page of the alleged original source. Unfortunately though, this wiki editor vents an accusation before investigating it properly, to verify if it is true, and he ends up creating a new, additional fraud. For in reality, the accusation made is not only false, but also turns things completely on their head: Mr Canterbery, the author of the 2018 book Inequality and Global Supra-surplus Capitalism, stole bits of this wiki article which I wrote myself, originally in 2011, and then included them almost verbatim in his 2018 book, without any acknowledgement to wikipedia. So, if there is a plagiarist, it is Mr Canterbery, and not me. I cannot do time travel, where I first steal an except from a book published in 2018, and then go back in time with my "science fiction time-machine" seven years earlier, to insert that excerpt into the text I was writing in 2011. The truth is, that my text existed 7 years before Mr Canterbery stole it for his own book, which can be proved straightforwardly from the archival record. What makes things even worse, is that it is totally inappropriate and fraudulent, to reference a con-artist from Florida in the article afterwards, as if he was the author! I have actually taken the trouble, to write to the publishers of Canterbery's book, and they have acknowledged receipt of my query - but so far, they appear to be unwilling to admit that their own author was proven guilty of plagiarism. User:Jurriaan 82.173.128.20 (talk) 14:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Economics[edit]

why surplus production required fir trade? 41.13.128.105 (talk) 11:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]