Talk:Surf Air

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

By all means keep the noise topic here. SurfAir's irresponsible pollution of the mid-peninsula "noise environment" is a recent and unwelcome intrusion. This is not a "you moved next to an airport" situation, but rather a commercial airline for the rich injecting itself into a previously-existing middle class environment.

This is a very major issue and needs to be kept in the airline's page.

Any attmpt to move it will be viewed as a cynical attempt to cleanse bad press by and from SurfAir, and will sully Wikipedia's reputation.

Section move proposal[edit]

I propose that section Surf Air#Noise complaints be moved to San Carlos Airport (California). Cited sources are specific to a single airport. Noise is generated by all aircraft operating at San Carlos Airport (California). 147.32.27.158 (talk) 18:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Response:[edit]

This is not accurate and appears to be a marketing attempt to sanitize. The news reports and previous cited sources which were edited out, clearly show that all noise complaints were and continue to be directed at Surf Air. The general airport noise has not been an issue for the communities complaining about Surf Air noise footprints. Please visit change.org (search Surf Air) for a historical snapshot of press that clearly communicates Surf Air specific noise issues.

Dfleck (talk) 18:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link in citation[edit]

The citation accompanying note 9 ("In December 2018, Surf Air's European arm went into liquidation.") is a bare URL which is extremely long: [1]. And that URL is broken, so I don't know how to find the content and provide a better URL. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]