Talk:Supplemental instruction

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

C-Class and Low-important characterization[edit]

The article has been reworked according to guidance provided by the template that flagged problems with references. Many more references have been added to Journals, newspaper articles, books and other materials. Also, I have added several new sections, including a "Criticism" section.

Regarding low-importance, supplemental instruction has been adopted by hundreds of institutions on several continents. "Low-importance" is a mischaracterization of SI. Even the original article had enough information in it to make me wonder why someone assigned that rating. I'd like to know what higher-education programs that are deemed important by that editor or those editors. Mbaugher (talk) 14:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]