A fact from Superior Craton appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 January 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Superior Craton covers central Canada?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Superior Craton.

Wikipedia

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Superior Craton is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Quebec / Manitoba / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

United States: North Dakota Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota.

South Dakota Low‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A copyright problem[edit]

This article appeared to be copyvio. I removed it. Please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20130908. Please don't restore any content unless you are sure it is free of copyright problems. bobrayner (talk) 18:38, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced a blank page resulting from the copyvio bit above with a short stub. Not much, but better than a blank page - should likely have been deleted back then. Will add to it when time permits. Vsmith (talk) 03:49, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Alex[edit]

It is recommended that using million years/ billion years, instead of Ma/Ga, which helps readers for understanding easier.
For the figure of "Pontiac Terrane", it is recommended to add legend for the directions of thrust faults.
I think you can remove the authors name when you write articles as your citation has already helped you to indicate who mentioned the arguments.
I really like your evolution diagrams in the section "Development" because each figures show in maps and cross-sections. This part is doing expectionally well since you help readers to engage to read what happens for the craton development, help the reader's understanding and suitable for earth science beginners.

--Alexnlk (talk) 11:16, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Tommy[edit]

1. I think it would be great to highlight which blocks were colliding. For example, you can paint the outline of Winnipeg River Terrane and North Caribou Terrane in bold during Uchian Orogeny.

2. The collision of WWT and WRT occurred at 2700 Ma However, the diagram shows they have assembled earlier.

3. In the diagram (before 2720 Ma), you use light green to represent NCT. But may I know why you separate the underneath section into 3 colours?

Makhkugeo (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Graeme[edit]

I suppose you are going to replace Superior Craton with your writing. It is a good idea as the existing article is very small. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Karen[edit]

I think it would be better to include a North arrow in each of the map you present.
"Ga" and "Ma" are used alternatively here. It is better to use either Ga/Ma throughout the articles to prevent confusion especially for readers without geology background.
Your illustrations are nice and clear. But, you might want to add the meanings of the abbreviations to the legend in order to make it useful in other wiki articles.

--LkwkarenHKU (talk) 02:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Helen[edit]

1. In your second illustration, I think it is a little bit messy that you put the ages on the map. It will be better if you can put the ages in the legend.

2. The colours of the first and second unit in your second illustration are very similar. You might want to change them so that the units are more recognizable.

3. Bullet symbols can be added in your See Also part.

HelenHYW (talk) 13:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Ken[edit]

1. "List of subprovinces and their dominating rocks": Make tables for different provinces separately would be better.

2. "Summary of the Western Superior Craton development": No need for hiding the table

3. You may insert more blue links.

4. Nice illustrations!

Kenwongtk (talk) 12:34, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Abraham[edit]

Improvement 1

The size of the legend of the major domains of the Superior Craton can be enlarged.

Improvement 2

The size arrangement of the three elements (legend, map view & cross-section) of the diagram "Before 2720 Ma, there were many pieces of microcontinent fragments which E-W trending conduit-like ocean crusts (with unknown extent) separates them" should be reconsidered.

Improvement 3

Some grammar mistakes, such as "the faults in the remaining southern part possess an east-west direction."

Well done

clear table showing the lithology. --AMLSIU (talk) 03:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]