Talk:Suecia Antiqua et Hodierna

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Here are some of the engravings from Suecia antiqua et hodierna that are hosted on Wikipedia:

Fred-Chess 00:24, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's a useful list though, but perhaps a category should be made out of it instead? It'd also be nice to add some annotations to the images as well. Libris has a database of the plates in Suecia (in swedish) [1] with information on the engravers and approximate years of engraving. Something should perhaps be said about the accuracy of the images as well, since they tend to embellish quite a bit. --BluePlatypus 12:56, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good points. These images are all accessed by clicking the link to "Wikimedia Commons" on the article page, where they also are categorized. Yes I also think a small description would be intersting, useful and perhaps also necessary, but it isn't my top priority. // Fred-Chess 13:09, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]