This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Nothing but a negative attack against Success University[edit]
This page tells absolutely nothing about Success University. All it does it criticise and paint it in a negative fashion. To be a neutral page, it needs to show the company in multiple views- i.e. information about the company from the company and/or supports as well as the criticism against it.
I have done you the favor of adding the {{NPOV}} tag to the article (please note that the article is well-referenced). If there are reliable sources that describe what the company does, what degrees the university offers, its accreditations, etc. then feel free to add that information with proper attributions. I think there are problems with citing the company's own information, unless they are clearly presented as the company's views. Thank you, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]