Talk:Substantive law

Substantive rights can also be conferred by common law or precedent. Shouldn't this be added to the article?

Added a teensy bit about that. PatrickR (talk) 23:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that a mention of the 14th Amendment (and the Slaughterhouse case) might be worth throwing in there. I guess that might make this article U.S. centric, but it's also not stopping someone from adding other case law. I don't know enough about it to do it myself, but maybe in a few weeks of reading, I may. Seer (talk) 19:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minor grammatical edit[edit]

I tried editing the first sentence to be more grammatically correct, but it still seems wrong. I hope it is better than it was.

Stuffed tiger (talk) 06:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]