Talk:Submarine hull

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Image copyright problem with Image:Komsomolets.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Komsomolets.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Folks, this is a worse article than the section at Submarine. Someone needs to move stuff from there to here. DJ Clayworth (talk) 14:56, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Missing topics[edit]

Early "open plan" submarines
Ballast tank relocations (see Saddle tank)
Pre-war cruiser submersibles, first V boats and bow design for seakeeping
X-1, Surcouf and gun-armed submersibles
M class giants and the problems of hangars or monitors
K boats and the problems of rapidly submerging a steam-powered boat
Minelayers
Development of conning towers, particularly the US Fleet submarines. Separation of conn and control rooms
Electric Boat vs Portsmouth building standards
- Nodal circle / neutral axis differences in non-circular framing
Riveting vs welding
Leaky fuel tanks
Dual-purpose convertible ballast tanks
Diesel vs diesel-electric drive and layout changes
Squalus & Thetis: detail redesigns to improve survivability
WWII

Submarine size: Type VII vs Fleet
Snorkels and prolonged running at periscope depth, rather than surfacing to recharge
Radar pickets and hull stretching
Guppy programs
Submarines rather than submersible operation; sails rather than conning towers
Albacore!
Nuclear propulsion
Hydroplane location: bow vs. sail
HY80 steel, Thresher
Soviet double hulls vs Western
Soviet Ti hulls
Sonar domes and the move to midships torpedo rooms
Regulus program and vast missile hangers
Whiskey ad hoc missile carriers, Hotels and external excrescences
Typhoon layout
Twin screw, single screw, propulsor
Silence: rafting, anechoic coatings, smoother waterflow
Spooks in boats, recycled cruise missile hangars, Halibut, US swimmer deliveries and Jimmy Carter
AIP and the resurgence of small non-nuclear boats

Andy Dingley (talk) 10:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weird wording suggest meaning other than was likely intended or true.[edit]

'...Inevitable minor deviations are resisted by the stiffener rings....' \ The above quote is one example of weird wording in this article. The rings are not resisting the deviations, though the sentence would certainly suggest that. How foolish those rings would be for resisting the inevitable anyway. 70.171.44.124 (talk) 08:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC) BGriffin[reply]