Talk:Subliminal messages in popular culture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

In the movie Fight Club (film), in scenes before the narrator meets Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt), the filmmakers inserted Tyler's presence in single frames for subliminal effect. Source, according to the article about the movie: Smith, Gavin (1999). "Inside Out: Gavin Smith Goes One-on-One with David Fincher". Film Comment. 35 (5): pp. 65. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help) --82.171.70.54 (talk) 03:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

nothing about max headroom's "blipverts"?[edit]

duncanrmi (talk) 10:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 February 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Closing as no consensus to move that article, non of the arguments actually vrelate to this move . Feel free to list the article at Wp:AFD (closed by non-admin page mover) Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 13:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Subliminal messages in popular cultureList of subliminal messages in popular culture – This seems to be a bit of a listicle as it is. -- AFreshStart (talk) 10:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete instead. It is mostly WP:OR and an example farm that violates WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. Even if it were made a list this would still be true. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 10:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • If kept, it should be moved to a "list of" name. I don't know if I agree that it's indiscriminate to have this list, but the current list entries are unusable anyway because they are OR. Delete, with no prejudice against later creation of a proper article/list. --Xurizuri (talk) 03:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.