Talk:Studio 4°C

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.

Japan: Business and economy Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 12:37, May 8, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Business and economy task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Anime and manga Mid‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

You forgot a short film.[edit]

There was a short film done by studio 4C and it was called Comedy, I think it runs fifteen minutes in length. I don't know if you put it as something else. It's about a keltic folklore involving a black swordsman who is also a cannibal and the town that a small irish girl is trying to save. If that doesn't ring any bells then I'm sure you can ask the scanlating group, Wizzu, about it. They translated it sometime 2 years ago.

I noticed this as well. If someone feels like expanding this article this might be a good place to start: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/company.php?id=359 --213.66.0.38 01:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should Genius Party and Genius Party Beyond be under feature films? They're both short film collections. --EsbenSloth (talk) 21:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the studio's website, "Comedy" is one of the Sweat Punch series of shorts, which were originally serialized on their Grasshoppa! DVDs and then collected on the DVD Deep Imagination.

Two notable differences between the Sweat Punch series and the Genius Party films is that the Sweat Punch episodes have been released separately as well as together and were made for home video; the Genius Party films have only ever been released as complete feature films (not separately first and then collected) and were made for cinemas. So they're arguably not a "collection", and "Comedy" is an OVA short rather than a "film" in the sense of "theatrical."

Tempjrds (talk) 04:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tone[edit]

Yes it is true that the tone of the article is not up to the standards. but it only needs rewrite. for the casual observer the superlatives used to describe some films seem advertising but this is just only unformated words, the kind used in the reviews and articles when those movies came out. 'mind game' WAS regarded as avant garde and similarly for animatrix and others. so, my point is that the information here is valid but not written or formated properly. therefore PLEASE do not delete the info here, just reformat it. and if anyone is wondering I AM NOT PART OF STUDIO4C. I am just aware of the studio through articles and movies i have seen or read. I might try to rewrite but it may take me few days before i am free. so if anyone is wiling to help I would appreciate. (I just hate good information go down the drain just because of a bad writing case. take care all. Danraz (talk) 16:05, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Attempt done. The writing is still bad (it reads like a machine translation), but it's no longer promotional. It really needs some inline citations, if any of those peacock terms are to be used. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:57, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]